As anyone who has spent any time around me knows, I am a compulsive list-maker. Especially for things like rides, runs, or anything that involves me remembering stuff that is out of the ordinary. I have checklists, broken down into applicable categories ("tack", camping gear", "rider clothes", etc), that I print out before every ride. I live with post-it notes stuck everywhere: reminders of what to buy, when to expect packages to arrive, how to organize items.
(Currently, I am staring at a list for an upcoming trail race that will involve putting together 4 different drop bags for a point-to-point course.)
I wasn't always this way.
I had to learn the hard way about the value of having a hard copy list, not just skimming through the mental checklist.
My most epic fail moment (to date) of forgetfulness was back in my show days. I had traveled out to California with my trainer for a weekend-long show...and when I went to tack up for the western classes, discovered that I had my felt liner pad, but not the decorative wool blanket for on top.
Not quite the end of the world...but in a fairly competitive environment, where details matter -- this mattered.
While I was busy having a meltdown, my parents (who had traveled out to the show to surprise me), did some fast networking and procured a spare pad (color-neutral enough to work with my turquoise outfit) from another rider's parents.
Turns out that rider was Kaity Elliott. At that point, we knew each other in that vague "I know that girl and her very spotty (Kaity)/very white (me) pony" way. But the "saddle pad incident" made us more than just vague acquaintances and competitors. We started talking to each other. And hanging out together at shows. And the rest, if you've been following this blog for any amount of time, is history, of our shared adventures in distance riding, horse borrowing, crewing, and other shenanigans. A lifelong friendship, all formed over a forgotten saddle pad.
The only other (I'm jinxing myself here...) thing I can remember for an event was the Sage Hill NATRC ride in 2002, in which I discovered halfway through the drive out that I forgot my half chaps and water reservoir for my hydration pack. Neither were deal-breakers, although I was convinced that since I was riding English, the stirrup leathers were going to pinch and rub my legs raw (they didn't), and that if I didn't have water on my person, I was going to die of dehydration (and since I'm sitting here writing this today, I obviously didn't). It was a 20-mile ride in the Santa Ynez mountains in November...I'm pretty sure I still even had water in my water bottles on the saddle by the end of the ride.
Of course, just last month I went down to the barn with the intention of riding...only to discover I had left my girth at home. Not the first time that's happened, which is one of the hazards of using your garage as your tack room and driving everything between your house and your horse. Sometimes it results in an impromptu bareback ride, sometimes in a pony lunging session, and sometimes in a "screw it, have a cookie and go back out to the pasture" approach.
The main thing that has contributed to me forgetting stuff? Doing something out of the ordinary and not putting it back in place. In the case of the water bladder, I had pulled it out to clean it and left it out to dry. I remembered my hydration pack...just forgot to retrieve the bladder. Same deal, same time with the half chaps: had washed them, hung them to dry, and assumed they made it back into the bag with all of my rider gear (helmet, half chaps, GPS, etc).
These days, I've gotten pretty good about keeping things organized and "in their place" and have a routine of where to grab what...but ultimately, it's my checklists that keep me in line and organized. And I make sure that before I have something checked off the list, I have physically put my hands on it, can account for it, and know that it is packed where it needs to be.
(Working on putting my checklists into a printable .pdf file if anyone is interested...I may start compiling informational things such as my packing lists into a separate information page on here if there is enough interest.)
Showing posts with label tack. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tack. Show all posts
Tuesday, February 17, 2015
Monday, December 1, 2014
an experiment
As most regular readers have probably noticed, it's been a little content-lite around here of late...and very horsey-content-lite. There's actually a reason (aside from my laziness and lack of motivation) for that.
I was dealing with a frustrating and somewhat disheartening issue with Mimi. Even since last year, I'd started having some intermittent problems with her tripping on the hind end, specifically when we were working in the sand arena. I did some basic evaluations of how she moved in-hand (sound), gave her a good trim, booted her all around...and it would still happen, every time I would ride in the arena, we'd hit a deeper patch of sand, and she would stumble or catch her hind end.
It got really, really frustrating, to the point where I basically didn't ride her for the better part of the summer/early fall. The fatalistic part of me thought, "Well, that's it...years of use has finally caught up to us, she's gone permanently crunchy, and one of these days, she's going to fall down on me." It was upsetting to me because I didn't know why (and don't have the $$$ to throw at a lot of vet diagnostics); it was upsetting to her because she's a careful, sensible horse with smart footwork -- I could see it visibly upsetting her every time she would trip, and she would try so hard not to.
So I gave her some time off from riding. I still went to the barn, still spent time with her, still trimmed her. She was obviously feeling good, watching her run out to the pasture (moving sound!).
About six weeks ago, I needed pony time. Don't even remember the specifics now, just that I needed to be on my pony's back. I had gone down to the barn not intending to ride, but something compelled me to hop up on her, bareback, using the only gear I currently had down at the barn, which was her dinky little sidepull.
She was perfect.
She gave me a smooth walk, and her trot was more than eager. My bareback seat is less-than-impressive (especially on what is essentially a 55-gallon drum), so I really don't do anything other than a slow trot pace, but she wanted to do more.
Hmm.
A week later, I repeated the experiment, this time slightly better equipped with bareback pad and actual headstall-with-brakes. Again, excellent, and even offering to canter. (Umm, no. Canter + bareback = Ash hits the dirt.)
The only thing that was different was a lack of saddle.
A part of my brain had toyed with the idea that maybe my saddle was too narrow (again!) for her. Part of me argued that we did all of our 50s in that saddle without any soreness...but she's a lot softer and out of shape now. I also didn't want to look too seriously at this possibility because it would mean needing a new saddle, which isn't in the current budget. (So, a permanently retired pasture puff was somehow the better option here? Don't ask me how my brain works sometimes...)
A couple of whiney texts later (that would be me whining), Lucy offered up her spare-spare treeless saddle -- a Barefoot Cheyenne model -- for me to test out my theory. I got the saddle last week, and after doing a make-over to one of my Skito pads to bolster it up to treeless saddle requirements, I headed out to the barn yesterday to test it out.
She loved it. We got a good 45 minutes of arena work in -- walk/trot/canter/circles -- and she was an angel. I've had a lot of resistance from her of late with wanting to rush the gate/acting arena sour...and that wasn't the case this time.
I was dealing with a frustrating and somewhat disheartening issue with Mimi. Even since last year, I'd started having some intermittent problems with her tripping on the hind end, specifically when we were working in the sand arena. I did some basic evaluations of how she moved in-hand (sound), gave her a good trim, booted her all around...and it would still happen, every time I would ride in the arena, we'd hit a deeper patch of sand, and she would stumble or catch her hind end.
It got really, really frustrating, to the point where I basically didn't ride her for the better part of the summer/early fall. The fatalistic part of me thought, "Well, that's it...years of use has finally caught up to us, she's gone permanently crunchy, and one of these days, she's going to fall down on me." It was upsetting to me because I didn't know why (and don't have the $$$ to throw at a lot of vet diagnostics); it was upsetting to her because she's a careful, sensible horse with smart footwork -- I could see it visibly upsetting her every time she would trip, and she would try so hard not to.
So I gave her some time off from riding. I still went to the barn, still spent time with her, still trimmed her. She was obviously feeling good, watching her run out to the pasture (moving sound!).
About six weeks ago, I needed pony time. Don't even remember the specifics now, just that I needed to be on my pony's back. I had gone down to the barn not intending to ride, but something compelled me to hop up on her, bareback, using the only gear I currently had down at the barn, which was her dinky little sidepull.
She was perfect.
She gave me a smooth walk, and her trot was more than eager. My bareback seat is less-than-impressive (especially on what is essentially a 55-gallon drum), so I really don't do anything other than a slow trot pace, but she wanted to do more.
Hmm.
A week later, I repeated the experiment, this time slightly better equipped with bareback pad and actual headstall-with-brakes. Again, excellent, and even offering to canter. (Umm, no. Canter + bareback = Ash hits the dirt.)
The only thing that was different was a lack of saddle.
A part of my brain had toyed with the idea that maybe my saddle was too narrow (again!) for her. Part of me argued that we did all of our 50s in that saddle without any soreness...but she's a lot softer and out of shape now. I also didn't want to look too seriously at this possibility because it would mean needing a new saddle, which isn't in the current budget. (So, a permanently retired pasture puff was somehow the better option here? Don't ask me how my brain works sometimes...)
A couple of whiney texts later (that would be me whining), Lucy offered up her spare-spare treeless saddle -- a Barefoot Cheyenne model -- for me to test out my theory. I got the saddle last week, and after doing a make-over to one of my Skito pads to bolster it up to treeless saddle requirements, I headed out to the barn yesterday to test it out.
| all decked out...maybe now we'll have somewhere to go? |
She also offered up the most lovely, rolling, collected-on-her-own canter I have felt from her in for a couple of years now. And that was entirely spontaneous on her part. She was also giving me her big trot -- the kind that makes 16hh horses canter to keep up. Awww, pony legs. :)))
The biggest thing was to have all of this happen in the arena. It's not secret between her and I that we both prefer the trail, and begrudgingly do arena stuff when it's the best we've got. Arena work also is my way of getting honest feedback from her. She's got an outstanding work ethic (I can only hope any subsequent horses are half as good), especially on trail, and will work through most discomfort if it means getting down the trail. In the arena, her feedback is more honest (a bit 'Princess and the Pea'-esque, to be honest), so to have her that forward and cheerful about arena stuff was exceptionally good.
Now we just need to get back out on trail. (And if she's this forward and cheerful, I may bring along that running martingale and remind her that the overabundance of enthusiasm isn't necessary.)
| fuzzy face!!! she is SO fluffy this winter...all of them are. which probably means it's gonna be cold. brrrr. |
Wednesday, May 7, 2014
Review: Taylored Tack Simple Hackamore Headstall
Bear with me...as with just about everything I do, there's usually a "why" for it...and an accompanying story.
Funny enough, I have a minimalist of a pony, especially when it comes to tack. It's taken me a while to realize this, but the less stuff on her face, the happier she is. Too much material, especially around/behind her ears, makes her sweat, which in turns makes her itch. End result of that is she then tries to over-enthusiastically remove the paint from whatever surface she is tied next to (vehicle, horse trailer, railing) by virtue of her itching and scrubbing her face against said surface.
My trailer ended up with more than one scratch in the paint from her rubbing before I was able to remove her headstall. (Powder coating being rubbed by metal buckles does not end well.)
The other thing I struggle with is that she doesn't have a whole lot of surface area on her face. "Pea head" is the term used on more than one occasion. And as lovely as all of my halter-bridle combos are, they don't work as well in conjunction with an s-hack when there is limited space available. The struggle I ran into was that in order to get the s-hack high enough on her nose, the chin strap would end up cross right on top of the underside of the halter noseband, which meant it wasn't engaging with her chin the way it should. (Translation: Less brakes and slower pony response time than I like.) Also, her ground manners are less than stellar in flat halters. (Read: "Let me run right through you during a trot-out.")
(Interestingly enough, if you look at a bunch of my ride photos, I used the Zilco equivalent of this set-up and never had a problem with space...it was only when I stopped using Zilco and switched to beta that I noticed this, so obviously the proportions of the Zilco halters are different.)
I've also used the add-on headstall over a rope halter idea. Her ground manners are much better when I have to lead with that, but I'll be honest: I don't love the look of the s-hack with a rope halter. Call me shallow, but..."If you can't ride fast, ride pretty." (Or just blame my show background.)
I've used the standard western headstall set-up (browband, throatlatch) with the s-hack before and it has worked well, but it was still more than what I really needed -- browband and two crownpieces behind the ears.
I really liked the look of the clean-line, simple headstalls, so that's what I ended up getting:
The Taylored Tack Simple Hackamore Headstall
Mimi's is, of course, purple.
I haven't had the chance to test it super-thoroughly (as compared to 25/50-mile rides/long training rides with the other set-ups) but the advantage of riding a horse for as long as I have her is I know when something works for her. And so far, I think this is working.
It's definitely been warm enough to generate the itchy, sweat pony effect, and the fact she's not throwing her head into my arms to "get this off me, now" is a good sign. It's also plenty secure, I was able to make all the adjustments needed, and as with all things Taylored Tack, the workmanship is gorgeous. I love how clean-line of a look it is, and it really sets off her pretty little head.
As far as leading/halter underneath...Mimi leads just fine from the s-hack. She yields to pressure from the noseband and chinstrap, and if need be, I do carry a small rope halter in my pack for ER purposes.
This will definitely be a set-up I revisit in the future for any additional pea-headed horses.
Now I'm itching to add a custom TT breastcollar to Mimi's tack collection, since I've never actually found a breastcollar to date that I've been completely satisfied with how it has fit her...
Funny enough, I have a minimalist of a pony, especially when it comes to tack. It's taken me a while to realize this, but the less stuff on her face, the happier she is. Too much material, especially around/behind her ears, makes her sweat, which in turns makes her itch. End result of that is she then tries to over-enthusiastically remove the paint from whatever surface she is tied next to (vehicle, horse trailer, railing) by virtue of her itching and scrubbing her face against said surface.
My trailer ended up with more than one scratch in the paint from her rubbing before I was able to remove her headstall. (Powder coating being rubbed by metal buckles does not end well.)
The other thing I struggle with is that she doesn't have a whole lot of surface area on her face. "Pea head" is the term used on more than one occasion. And as lovely as all of my halter-bridle combos are, they don't work as well in conjunction with an s-hack when there is limited space available. The struggle I ran into was that in order to get the s-hack high enough on her nose, the chin strap would end up cross right on top of the underside of the halter noseband, which meant it wasn't engaging with her chin the way it should. (Translation: Less brakes and slower pony response time than I like.) Also, her ground manners are less than stellar in flat halters. (Read: "Let me run right through you during a trot-out.")
(Interestingly enough, if you look at a bunch of my ride photos, I used the Zilco equivalent of this set-up and never had a problem with space...it was only when I stopped using Zilco and switched to beta that I noticed this, so obviously the proportions of the Zilco halters are different.)
I've also used the add-on headstall over a rope halter idea. Her ground manners are much better when I have to lead with that, but I'll be honest: I don't love the look of the s-hack with a rope halter. Call me shallow, but..."If you can't ride fast, ride pretty." (Or just blame my show background.)
| To me, this is just "too much stuff" crammed on her pretty little face. |
I've used the standard western headstall set-up (browband, throatlatch) with the s-hack before and it has worked well, but it was still more than what I really needed -- browband and two crownpieces behind the ears.
I really liked the look of the clean-line, simple headstalls, so that's what I ended up getting:
The Taylored Tack Simple Hackamore Headstall
Mimi's is, of course, purple.
I haven't had the chance to test it super-thoroughly (as compared to 25/50-mile rides/long training rides with the other set-ups) but the advantage of riding a horse for as long as I have her is I know when something works for her. And so far, I think this is working.
It's definitely been warm enough to generate the itchy, sweat pony effect, and the fact she's not throwing her head into my arms to "get this off me, now" is a good sign. It's also plenty secure, I was able to make all the adjustments needed, and as with all things Taylored Tack, the workmanship is gorgeous. I love how clean-line of a look it is, and it really sets off her pretty little head.
As far as leading/halter underneath...Mimi leads just fine from the s-hack. She yields to pressure from the noseband and chinstrap, and if need be, I do carry a small rope halter in my pack for ER purposes.
This will definitely be a set-up I revisit in the future for any additional pea-headed horses.
Now I'm itching to add a custom TT breastcollar to Mimi's tack collection, since I've never actually found a breastcollar to date that I've been completely satisfied with how it has fit her...
Tuesday, March 25, 2014
arena work stats
One thing I hear from a lot of endurance riders is a dislike for arena work. While it's not my favorite thing, I don't really mind it, and I definitely do my best foundational training in a controlled arena setting. Just for fun, I turned on one of my GPS apps this past weekend to clock my ride time with the pony.
What I learned was interesting.
Duration: 31:50
Distance: 3.18 miles
Average Speed: 6.0 mph
Max Speed: 9.5 mph
Mimi consistently walks at 3.5-4 mph. She can bump it up faster, but that is her comfortable range. Her trot is 7-9 mph, and her canter is 8-9 mph. I found it curious that, for us, cantering gains us nothing in terms of speed and covering ground, but it does offer up a change of gait and muscles used.
The arena at the barn is all sand, too, so that was the equivalent of a pretty good sand wash workout. And when I'm in an arena, I'm not just riding endless laps. I ask for engaged collection, we do a lot of gait changes, and circles, and flexion. So I was pleasantly surprised to see just how effective of a workout my arena sessions can actually provide.
A few photos from the past couple of weeks:
| New browband from Taylored Tack to dress up an old bridle. Mimi has always been the purple princess. |
| she will slam on the brakes in the middle of a schooling session if she's thirsty |
| Perky Pony! New reins, also from Taylored Tack. They're purple, and camo. How could I resist??? |
Labels:
arena work,
conditioning,
mimi,
tack
Saturday, September 28, 2013
pre-ride shakedown cruise...for the rider
Today involved a fantastic, 18-mile ride on Khan again with Lancette. Parts of it were entirely new-to-me trail, as well as reinforcement of some trails previously ridden. (It's an area of criss-crossing and intersecting trails, sand washes, and service roads -- keep heading in the general direction of your intended destination and you'll probably get there in some form or fashion.)
It was good timing, too -- one last big ride before next weekend's Man Against Horse ride. I've stayed in good riding shape all summer, so I wasn't concerned about that part. But I did have some new gear I wanted to thoroughly test out before going into a ride environment, including new stirrup leathers.
I've been riding in Zilco leathers, but the stirrup bars on my saddle make it impossible to ride with the buckle at the bar -- the pressure point it creates on my thighs is pretty uncomfortable after a short while. I can get around that by rotating the leathers so that the buckle is at the bottom, on the stirrup top bar. The downside to this is the flopping tail of stirrup leather, solved by covering the whole apparatus with fleece stirrup leather covers. The problems with this set-up: It's harder to adjust the stirrup length, which I frequently need to do depending on the horse I'm riding, and the fleece adds extra bulk under my leg.
It was good timing, too -- one last big ride before next weekend's Man Against Horse ride. I've stayed in good riding shape all summer, so I wasn't concerned about that part. But I did have some new gear I wanted to thoroughly test out before going into a ride environment, including new stirrup leathers.
![]() |
| new stirrup leathers passed the mileage test |
A couple of weeks ago, on a whim, I ordered a pair of stirrup leather from Schneiders Saddlery. They're the kind with the buckles riveted to the top of the leather, and they're supposed to be thin and low-profile and not bulky. The price didn't exactly break the bank, and if they didn't do exactly as I hoped for log-term use...well, it never hurts to have an extra pair of stirrup leathers around.
They passed last weekend's arena test, although I recognized that an hour in the arena wasn't anywhere near the kind of workout a good distance ride will give them. I'm happy to report today's ride did just that. Ton of trotting and cantering, ups and downs, twisty single-track and wide-open roads. How I feel tomorrow morning will be the ultimate test, but I didn't feel the buckles under my thigh while riding, and I don't have any soreness or bruising now. It was kind of nice to be able to ditch the fleece covers -- that much less between my leg and the horse now. The leathers are nylon-lined to prevent them from stretching, and they have some nice "give" to them, so I wasn't feeling any shin pressure either.
I'm definitely comfortable enough to leave them on the saddle and do the ride next weekend in them. I'll probably bring the fleece covers just in case, but if I did 18 miles without a problem, it's only 7 more miles for the 25.
![]() |
| wild horses at the trailhead |
We saw a number of wild horses today! Apparently there are bands of them that live down by the river. I'd heard of them, but until today, I'd never seen them. We came across them three different times today, and I think it was three different bands. They were vaguely curious about us, but very wary and preferred to move away from us when in doubt. It was fascinating to watch the stallions do their rear-guard duty, and the body language between the herd members.
One of the more unusual bits of river debris I've encountered. Much more typical is beer cans.
The river was absolutely gorgeous today. Running a bit higher and faster as a result of monsoon season, but there is a great area to water the horses that is quiet and shallow and sandy. There was a ton of loose water grass being carried with the current, and Khan greatly enjoyed reaching out and snagging the floating grasses. Yummy.
Pony time for me tomorrow, then before I know it, I will be Prescott-bound for Man Against Horse! I started some packing and organizing today when I got home, and will get more done tomorrow in the form of cleaning grubby tack after the pony gets done adding yet another layer of grunge to it.
They all looked healthy, so whatever they're living on out there, they're doing okay.
We went down to the river as the halfway point and gave the horses and drink and sponging. I never get tired of river-time and it will always remain a novel concept to this desert rat.
The river was running really clear today, clear enough to see to the bottom.
I sank Khan's Renegades in about 3' of water for a good 10 minutes, then we turned around and went back up the sand wash, up a very steep, rocky climb (which we trotted the last part), and then took off trotting down a service road. Boots didn't budge the entire time.
Right about the time I was admiring how crystal-clear the water was, and how it would make for a great "boots in water" shot, I looked over to the side and saw a horseshoe wedged under a river rock. In the photo, it's below the center of the photo, just above the blobby bits of green underwater vegetation.
![]() |
| Lancette and "Hot Lips" playing in the river. |
We went down to the river as the halfway point and gave the horses and drink and sponging. I never get tired of river-time and it will always remain a novel concept to this desert rat.
The river was running really clear today, clear enough to see to the bottom.
![]() |
| Obligatory response photo for those who say "hoof boots can't do water." |
![]() |
| It's like a "Where's Waldo?" photo. Can you find the hidden shoe? |
Right about the time I was admiring how crystal-clear the water was, and how it would make for a great "boots in water" shot, I looked over to the side and saw a horseshoe wedged under a river rock. In the photo, it's below the center of the photo, just above the blobby bits of green underwater vegetation.
One of the more unusual bits of river debris I've encountered. Much more typical is beer cans.
![]() |
| Horse ears. Sunshine. River. Some views never get old. |
The river was absolutely gorgeous today. Running a bit higher and faster as a result of monsoon season, but there is a great area to water the horses that is quiet and shallow and sandy. There was a ton of loose water grass being carried with the current, and Khan greatly enjoyed reaching out and snagging the floating grasses. Yummy.
![]() |
| looking downstream on the Salt River |
Pony time for me tomorrow, then before I know it, I will be Prescott-bound for Man Against Horse! I started some packing and organizing today when I got home, and will get more done tomorrow in the form of cleaning grubby tack after the pony gets done adding yet another layer of grunge to it.
Wednesday, September 18, 2013
love-hate relationship: heart rate monitors
As you might have guessed from the title, I have a love-hate relationship with using heart rate monitors on my horses. I will say that they have their benefits, but they also come with a full set of hair-yanking annoyances.
To start, let's discuss technical details. There are two main brands of equine Heart Rate Monitors on the market: Polar and V-Max, and two styles, either the belt or the electrodes. I have one of each brand and one of each style.
The Polar HRM I have is actually a human chest belt, the T31 transmitter, adapted for equine use with a homemade neoprene belt. They do have an actual equine belt now as well. I have an extremely basic Polar HRM watch that does nothing more than give you the heart rate reading when it's connected.
The nice thing about the belt is that it can stay on the horse once you pull the saddle, so you don't need a handheld unit to monitor the heart rate.
electrode style, this one from V-Max. This one is also very basic, although the watch displays both the heart rate and the time at the same time.
To start, let's discuss technical details. There are two main brands of equine Heart Rate Monitors on the market: Polar and V-Max, and two styles, either the belt or the electrodes. I have one of each brand and one of each style.
The Polar HRM I have is actually a human chest belt, the T31 transmitter, adapted for equine use with a homemade neoprene belt. They do have an actual equine belt now as well. I have an extremely basic Polar HRM watch that does nothing more than give you the heart rate reading when it's connected.
| the belt style in approximately the correct position |
The cons that I experienced with the belt where that, due to Mimi's barrel-like conformation, it was extremely difficult to keep the transmitter in the proper position. It had a tendency to slide around her barrel, sending some truly outrageous readings to the watch, and when I would glance down in alarm ("Surely we're not walking at 200+ bpm!"), I would see the transmitter had migrated to the top of her withers. There's a velcro strap around it that you can wrap around the breastcollar to keep it from migrating backwards, but that doesn't help with the spinning around.
I will say I never experienced that problem on horses with high withers.
The other major problem was the lifespan of the belts: Short. They are homemade from neoprene weight belts, so I can't speak for the quality of the ones directly from Polar. I started using the belt style back when they were a DIY affair cobbled together from various offerings and the imaginations of creative people.
Although I never had a problem with it, something to watch would be the belt under the girth, and positioning of the transmitter so that it doesn't encourage girth galls. A horse who is sensitive in the armpit area might have problems with that much "stuff" in there.
This was the first HRM I got, and aside from changing out the batteries in both the watch and the transmitter once, it has held together really well.
My quibble about this style is that it is fussier to put on: you have to position the electrodes correctly so that you get a good reading, and I would caution on placement of the under-saddle electrode that you use care to not place the electrode right under the stirrup bars or any higher-pressure area. While they are low profile, I have seen horses that develop white hair patches in the exact shape of the electrode over time.
It's also something to pay attention to when unsaddling, particularly the electrode attached to the girth. It's pretty easy to drop the girth and yank it away without disconnecting the electrode, which then might end up yanking the leads (wires) out of the electrode. But this style also doesn't move once you have them in place, so as long as they are positioned well, they tend to given pretty accurate readings. (However, if you are walking along at 200+ all of a sudden, lean down and check that your girth electrode hasn't gotten yanked out and is now merrily dangling next to your horse's side.)
Those are some of the mechanical/technical pros and cons of HRMs. Let's talk about my own personal philosophy and approach to their use.
A heart rate monitor is a TOOL. It is not a substitute for the FEEL of a horse.
It is not a speedometer, or tachometer. It is a piece of electronic equipment designed to give you feedback you might not otherwise get. I do not ride based off of the HRM, but I use the HRM's feedback to support what I'm feeling or not from the horse.
I would say learn to feel your horse and know them before relying too much on technological input. I put a lot of stock into gut instinct, and I generally think I have a pretty good read and feel of a horse. I know that I personally like getting feedback: It's really great to know how fast the horse is recovering, or what their HR tends to be at various gaits, or determining what speed within a gait might be most efficient for them.
But if you're a worrywart like me, a HRM can be an instrument of torture if you pay too much attention to it. Which then goes back to my original approach of "treat it as a tool." If you have a high reading, take a quick stock and assessment: Did the belt rotate? Is an electrode loose? Bad connection? If a reading that is concerning persists, that's when the feel of the horse comes in to play. Are they trotting along happily, breathing steady, feeling "normal?" Then it's probably a technological issue, or a temporary blip. What's your gut telling you? Is there something about your horse that is not quite "right?" If so, maybe the HRM is backing up what your gut -- and your horse -- is telling you.
Here are some specific-to-me examples of when I've benefitted (or not) from using a HRM:
-- Mimi can be a very subtle horse about telling me when something is wrong. Both times she had a tie-up, the main indicator was a hanging pulse. Not high, just hanging -- extremely uncharacteristic for her, coupled with a lack of enthusiasm for moving out willingly. The lack of wanting to move out -- probably the most uncharacteristic sign from her there is a problem, since she is the Go Pony -- was what made me look at the HRM, and the hanging numbers confirmed by suspicions. Fortunately, both times were caught very early on in the process, before they could become a major problem.
-- When I took Beamer to a ride, using the HRM was extremely beneficial because he could be somewhat of a sandbagger. He might act like he was all used up...but when he's walking at 48 bpm in a sand wash after 25 miles, he wasn't too exhausted...he just thought he was. In that case, having the HRM didn't actually help me get him to go faster -- when he decided he was done, that was that -- but it did reassure me that I hadn't actually pushed him too hard.
-- It's been a handy tool when I'm riding horses I'm unfamiliar with. Not that it helps a ton while riding, since I'm usually not familiar with their standard working pulses -- a bit alarming at first to be used to one who trots at 120 only to get on one whose trotting average is 140 and you start to wonder if there's something wrong...no, that's just the horse -- but it does help to establish some basic patterns. It doesn't matter the actual numbers in the sense that, if they're going along at one close range for a while, then it starts shooting up, now might be a good time for a breather.
- When riding Liberty at Prescott, the HRM actually was a good tool in helping me figure her out. She's a brave, bold, forward horse who is happy to motor along pretty consistently (especially for a greenie), but she wasn't showing signs of wanting to take a breather on her own. From what I remember, her trotting average was around 120, so when her HR started to jump to 135-140, that's when I would ask her for a walk break, and usually several minutes later, she was ready to go again.
- She did hit a wall partway through the ride, but based on her HR, it was more mental than physical, and I actually chalk that one up to rider error. I got pretty caught up in how solid she was and how much fun I was having riding her that I, quite frankly, forgot she was still a green horse on only her second ride. She led the first 9 miles of the ride, and I think she probably got a little bit overwhelmed mentally. Rather than freak out, she just stopped and asked, in her own way, that the other horse be the one to lead for a while. She was more than happy to keep following.
- I monitored her HR, and it stayed in the same low patterns, so my conclusion based on that was she was still physically feeling good and not being overly taxed -- but she needed the mental break. It worked. She got a good break for the next third of the ride, and then after the vet check, we made a point of alternating who was leading or following much more frequently -- switching off every mile or so -- and by that point, she was happy to take the lead and move out again.
-- It's a pretty nice tool to have at a VC, to be able to know when your horse is down, or for learning how fast they take to drop to 'x' point.
- I "hide" my HRM screen from pulse-takers, so as to not accidentally influence what they're hearing. I want to know if they're hearing something different than what I might be getting.
- That said: This is again another area for "technical difficulties." Don't rely entirely on the HRM -- know how to take your horse's pulse manually or with a stethoscope, since the monitor might not be reading perfectly accurately (one of the rides I was at this spring, my HRM was consistently reading four beats higher than what P&R people and vets were getting) or may be having some issues.
I think that just about exhausts my HRM repertoire...I'm by no means an expert, this is just personal opinions gleaned off of the past ten years of experience in messing around with them.
For those that are curious, I am currently using the V-Max electrode system. After going back to it, I'm on the fence as to if I like the belt system anymore or not.
If there's something I didn't cover, or any questions I raised, please ask!
Labels:
conditioning,
endurance,
tack,
training
Sunday, September 1, 2013
fashion plate
From dayglow orange and biothane...
... to classic black leather.
Pony looks good no matter what she wears.
Thursday, August 1, 2013
Tailing Lines
(Still working on my Tevis crewing story. What can I say? I write epic novels for fun.)
This is what happens when a back-and-forth conversation gets turned into a blog post, especially since I'd already taken the photos.
Mel and I have been discussing some of our different gear and equipment, and the subject of the tailing line that I use came up. It's one I made myself, since I'm apparently a bit fussy and just-so about things like tailing lines and reins.
I picked up quite a bit of this rope (I want to say it's 1/4" diameter yacht rope) when I was at the Scottsdale Show this year. I intend to some day attempt to tie my own rope halter. *hysterical laughter* Yeah, right. In the meantime, I will stick with tailing ropes.
Finished length, with all the knots in place, is just under 9' long. You might make it shorter or longer depending on size of horse.
The end that clips to the halter is a scissor snap.
The first knotted loop past the scissor snap is at approximately 3' in. Again, this may be adjusted depending on horse size. Tie knots loosely at first so they're adjustable. Second loop/knot is another 2' back.
End that clips to the saddle, and holds the knotted loops while riding, is a carabiner. I used a Nite-Ize S-Biner, size 4. I like the double-sided option, as it keeps the loops separate from the side that clips to the saddle -- less likely for the loops to accidentally slip off.
Excess loops clip to the carabiner when riding. Snap end clips to the halter.
Entire apparatus clipped to the saddle, ready for riding. I just used an old thin luggage strap attachment piece because it's thin leather, so if the rope does happen to snag on something, there's a good chance the leather will break.
This is what happens when a back-and-forth conversation gets turned into a blog post, especially since I'd already taken the photos.
Mel and I have been discussing some of our different gear and equipment, and the subject of the tailing line that I use came up. It's one I made myself, since I'm apparently a bit fussy and just-so about things like tailing lines and reins.
I picked up quite a bit of this rope (I want to say it's 1/4" diameter yacht rope) when I was at the Scottsdale Show this year. I intend to some day attempt to tie my own rope halter. *hysterical laughter* Yeah, right. In the meantime, I will stick with tailing ropes.
Finished length, with all the knots in place, is just under 9' long. You might make it shorter or longer depending on size of horse.
The end that clips to the halter is a scissor snap.
The first knotted loop past the scissor snap is at approximately 3' in. Again, this may be adjusted depending on horse size. Tie knots loosely at first so they're adjustable. Second loop/knot is another 2' back.
End that clips to the saddle, and holds the knotted loops while riding, is a carabiner. I used a Nite-Ize S-Biner, size 4. I like the double-sided option, as it keeps the loops separate from the side that clips to the saddle -- less likely for the loops to accidentally slip off.
Excess loops clip to the carabiner when riding. Snap end clips to the halter.
Entire apparatus clipped to the saddle, ready for riding. I just used an old thin luggage strap attachment piece because it's thin leather, so if the rope does happen to snag on something, there's a good chance the leather will break.
Tuesday, February 12, 2013
the groundhog lied
I'm sorry, but what part of the last several days of dropping down to the 50s in the day and freezing at night can possibly constitute "early spring"?
Oh, and did I mention the rain?
Still, it was a great excuse to finally do some mud-slinging with my boots. Contrary to popular belief, not every inch of space around here is covered in sand.
Will experiment with the tailing lines and report my findings later.
Oh, and did I mention the rain?
| Riding was the fun part. Clean-up afterwards, not so much. |
And as much as I sometimes grumble about pulling out every marginally-water-resistant article of clothing I own to function through the winter rainy season...it is good for the water table, especially when the mountains get their fair share of fluffy white stuff.
Still, if the groundhog could be temporarily right for the two weekends following this next, that would be great. Last weekend of February, I'm heading out to the 20 Mule Team ride in Ridgecrest to crew for friend Kaity, riding the 100-miler, as well as be on hand to do my Renegade thing. Southern CA is even more notorious for unpredictable weather during the winter, so I've been giving the AccuWeather month-out predictions as much credence as the damn groundhog. (And packing my rain gear.)
Then the first weekend in March, I'm heading down to the Sonoita ride...to ride! 50-miler on day one on a friend's horse (who I met and rode last weekend...12 miles later, the horse and I still liked each other, so the ride was declared a 'go'), then the possibility of the LD on either day two or three on another friend's horse (who I will meet this weekend).
Busy, busy...I love it.
And I'm currently completely surrounded by bits-n-bobbles of various ride stuffs. A sampler pack of various GU products (energy gels, energy chomps, e'lyte drinks) sits on my overflow desk. Two boxes of boots are sitting in the middle of my bedroom. One pair of boots is in the process of having cables adjusted and straps changed out. I'm currently experimenting with tying my own tailing line...see photo below.
| Purple is existing, lightweight yacht rope. Orange is 4mm climbing rope. Tan is 5mm climbing rope. |
Making things slightly more interesting is the fact I'm flying out for 20 Mule Team, so am limited by what I can cram into a suitcase, versus filling all available space of a suburban. Ah, well. I'm not riding, so that's easier...and I do love a challenge.
Thursday, August 30, 2012
fashion plate
My pony has new clothes. :)
We be official, all decked out in Renegade orange. And it looks surprisingly good on her. I think she likes her new get-up...she was positively preening as I was messing with adjustments.
And we look a bit more put together now than the color-clash fashion disaster we had been turning into.
Still working on my Tevis write-up.
And we look a bit more put together now than the color-clash fashion disaster we had been turning into.
Still working on my Tevis write-up.
Tuesday, April 3, 2012
Barn Rule Number I've-Lost-Count
No changing out the curb chain on kimberwick bits. Ever.
A few years ago, I got the bright idea of swapping out the curb chain on the kimberwick I was using for a beta-ended, Western-style curb chain, the theory being that I wouldn't have to undo it all the time.
Great in theory...doesn't work for Princess Pea-Head in practice, since I only recently figured out I couldn't actually get the curb chain properly tight enough under her cute lil' muzzle.
How long have you been riding?!?
If you've ever tried to remove a curb chain, you know that wrenching apart the J-hooks with pliers twists them out of shape and renders them really hard to use in the future.
But did you also know there's a certain way to put new ones on? As in, there's a right one and a left one, and when hung right, won't poke the horse's jaw with the open ends of the hooks?
I learned these things this afternoon.
This curb chain is never leaving this bit again.
A few years ago, I got the bright idea of swapping out the curb chain on the kimberwick I was using for a beta-ended, Western-style curb chain, the theory being that I wouldn't have to undo it all the time.
Great in theory...doesn't work for Princess Pea-Head in practice, since I only recently figured out I couldn't actually get the curb chain properly tight enough under her cute lil' muzzle.
How long have you been riding?!?
If you've ever tried to remove a curb chain, you know that wrenching apart the J-hooks with pliers twists them out of shape and renders them really hard to use in the future.
But did you also know there's a certain way to put new ones on? As in, there's a right one and a left one, and when hung right, won't poke the horse's jaw with the open ends of the hooks?
I learned these things this afternoon.
This curb chain is never leaving this bit again.
Labels:
tack
Tuesday, March 20, 2012
The Hardest Part of Shopping...
...is knowing where to go.
Part of the fun of endurance for me is all the stuff that it can entail. My motto is, "If you can't ride fast, ride pretty."
I think this picture makes my point:
Part of the fun of endurance for me is all the stuff that it can entail. My motto is, "If you can't ride fast, ride pretty."
I think this picture makes my point:
Note all the coordinating purple and gold and wild tights (from Evelyn).
Although my shopping is down to pretty much a bare minimum now (not much I actually need anymore), I still end up picking up to occasional replacement piece...stuff does wear out over time.
But it's really hard to decide where to shop. I've had the pleasure of having very, very positive encounters with all of the endurance vendors I've ever done business with. I'd go back to every single one of them...and many of them, I have. You can see the "Recommended Gear and Vendors" tab at the top of the page for a more detailed write-up of some of my favorites.
But yesterday, Action Rider Tack got a double thumbs-up from me. I love browsing their webpage...they tend to stock stuff no one else does, and I'm pretty much insatiably curious about what's out there, even if it's stuff I don't use or need.
After about an hour of browsing, I finally placed my order (proper sharpener for my loop hoof knife, if anyone's curious). Less than an hour after placing it, I received a notification that my package was shipping out, along with a fabulous, creative customer service email from the ladies at ART, thanking me for my order.
Now that's fast turnaround! Definitely impressed me, and I'm sure I'll be placing future orders there.
I have to spread out where I order things, since I like/am friends with quite a few of the vendors out there. It helps when a specific product is only carried by one vendor.
But I love good customer service. I've been raised in a small-business environment where I've watched my parents go out of their way to provide their clients excellent customer service in both the carpet cleaning business and memory art business. During high school/college, I working in a shipping/mailbox center that emphasized cheerful, helpful customer service. That has continued to be the case now in working at Renegade.
So I've pretty much had a lifetime of providing customer service or seeing what good customer service looks like (and bad...I'm looking at you, ASU and Gateway CC...good customer service obviously isn't part of the college make-up), so when I'm on the receiving end of it, it feels really good to know that plenty of other people out there also care.
Thursday, February 2, 2012
Just when I've got things figured out...
You would think, after 15 years together, I'd have my pony figured out.
Except not.
I've written in the past about just how dead-set she is against bits. Have yet to find one she really likes, blah-blah-blah, she goes best in her s-hack, so on and so forth.
Of course she had to prove me wrong yesterday. I've made mention of my bit collection and how it is almost physically impossible for me to get rid of any bits I own, and so always have plenty of bits floating around for various experimental purposes and kicks.
Just for some of those kicks, yesterday I pulled out the Myler Full Cheek snaffle I own. I used this bit on her quite a few years ago, when we were first starting out in NATRC. I don't remember if it was good or bad. The couple of ride photos I have of her in it, she's not tugging and fussing and pulling faces. Always a good sign.
Exhibit A: (It's hard to see, but trust me, it's the full-cheek snaffle. It's a picture of a picture, since my computer ate my flash drive that had all of the images of my ride pics I had scanned and I wasn't going to tear apart my ride scrapbook to rescan 'em all.)
Especially when this is the alternative:
Safe to say she doesn't like the loose-ring, French-link snaffle. Especially since I have another several pics that look almost exactly like above.
So yesterday, out comes the Full Cheek again. And she decided it was perfectly acceptable.
Of course.
Sheloves likes tolerates the one bit I don't like to use. (Something about those full cheek pieces getting hooked on things like belts, belt loops, bridle cheekstraps, water troughs...get the picture?)
What I'd like to know is if it's the bit, or the mouthpiece. It's the Myler Comfort Snaffle with Twist. The slightly rigid aspect of the comfort snaffle means it's pretty solid in her mouth...not a lot of play or wiggle, so she fusses with it less.
*shrug*
Apparently she likes to keep things interesting.
Except not.
I've written in the past about just how dead-set she is against bits. Have yet to find one she really likes, blah-blah-blah, she goes best in her s-hack, so on and so forth.
Of course she had to prove me wrong yesterday. I've made mention of my bit collection and how it is almost physically impossible for me to get rid of any bits I own, and so always have plenty of bits floating around for various experimental purposes and kicks.
Just for some of those kicks, yesterday I pulled out the Myler Full Cheek snaffle I own. I used this bit on her quite a few years ago, when we were first starting out in NATRC. I don't remember if it was good or bad. The couple of ride photos I have of her in it, she's not tugging and fussing and pulling faces. Always a good sign.
Exhibit A: (It's hard to see, but trust me, it's the full-cheek snaffle. It's a picture of a picture, since my computer ate my flash drive that had all of the images of my ride pics I had scanned and I wasn't going to tear apart my ride scrapbook to rescan 'em all.)
| Descanso Desperados NATRC October 2002 Photo by Cheryl Erpelding |
Especially when this is the alternative:
| Chino Hills NATRC April 2003 Photo by Ray Brezina |
So yesterday, out comes the Full Cheek again. And she decided it was perfectly acceptable.
Of course.
She
What I'd like to know is if it's the bit, or the mouthpiece. It's the Myler Comfort Snaffle with Twist. The slightly rigid aspect of the comfort snaffle means it's pretty solid in her mouth...not a lot of play or wiggle, so she fusses with it less.
*shrug*
Apparently she likes to keep things interesting.
| Innocence |
Friday, December 16, 2011
A Bit of A Collection
I have a confession to make.
I collect bits.
I probably can't even count how many bits I've used/owned over the years. Start between "a lot" and "a ton" and go from there. It started with my show days and went from there. I think I probably used seven or eight different Western bits over the years, starting with a snaffle and very quickly moving into all manner of ported/shanked leverage bits. The joys of a young pony with no brakes and a young rider with no upper body strength. Shortcuts R Us. But I didn't know any different at the time. I was still trying to figure out how to ride a young horse, let alone train one.
English was easier...very quickly moved into a kimberwick and stayed there for pretty much our entire show career.
And gymkhana quickly complicated things again. Snaffle while I was still teaching her the patterns, then over to a mechanical hackamore when we started picking up the speed. But of course it couldn't be that simple...maybe one style of mechanical hackamore works better than another? And then on a whim, the week before our last show, I snagged an S-Hack while at the feed store. I had done about a year of distance riding at that point, and had seen distance riders using them. I figured I might eventually be able to use it. The real whim came about at the show when I put it on Mimi (without any testing/pre-riding at all) and ran all of the games in it. (And had some of the best runs ever.)
But distance riding really fed my bit obsession.
Mimi's always been a bit fussy. She has a low palate and a tiny mouth, and spends half of her time evading the bit rather than working with it. My trainer and I spent a lot of time swapping out bits, trying to find one she would work in. Fortunately, I learned my bit collecting ways very well from my trainer, and she had an entire box of bits to raid.
Distance riding also expanded my horizons and really furthered my education. For the first time, I was really examining the why of things, instead of accepting that something was "traditional and always done this way." Bit function was one of those areas of education, and that exploration brought me to the Myler bits.
I love Myler bits.
Mimi tolerates them.
I've gradually gotten rid of all of my other bits in favor of just keeping the Myler ones. I really appreciate their form and function and how they're designed to work with the horse. I feel like I end up with more of a connection and softer feel of the horse's mouth.
(Not a spokesperson/representative/paid mouthpiece for Myler. I just really like the product.)
And irony of ironies?
I barely use any of the bits I have.
As mentioned, Mimi really doesn't like bits. She tolerates the Myler ones. But she prefers to go bitless. Remember that S-Hack I mentioned earlier? Yep. That's her preferred headgear of choice.
It sort of looks like a jumble of purple spaghetti, but that's Mimi's trail bridle. Zilco Deluxe Endurance Halter/Bridle with the Wind Rider Aluminum S-Hack and Hought Beta-Biothane Noseband.
I really like the flatter beta nosebands that are out there now...much easier on their faces than the stiff rope-style nosebands. I've seen the rope-style used on horses that pull, and they eventually develop a bump on their nose from rubbing/pressure. Several layers of Vetwrap is supposed to combat this...
My major caveat on the hack: I prefer to use it on a horse that's already well-schooled in giving to pressure and going along nicely in a bit. Mimi responds really well to it, and I think a lot of that is due in part to the fact she's just happy it's not a bit, and therefore will cheerfully obey without fuss.
It still took me a couple of years of doing NATRC to work up the nerve to try it on her at an actual ride. She did great when I did finally use it, but then right about that time I started getting involved in endurance, and the idea of the faster pace and more race-like environment had me scrambling back to my comfort zone of a bit for our first year of endurance. October 2007, I used the hack on her at a ride, and haven't gone back to a bit since, except for schooling.
My preferred set-ups for schooling at the moment. Myler Kimberwick with Comfort Snaffle mouthpiece (MB02). It's considered a "Level One" (mild, typically used for intro level) mouthpiece. I like that it acts very much like a double-jointed snaffle, but it has less "play" in it and it's less work for the horse to hold it in their mouth.
I pulled off the regular kimberwick curb chain and replaced it with a biothane curb chain, because 1) the constant jingling from curb chains annoys me and 2) I'm lazy and hate having to always fiddle with the on/off of a curb chain. I like the ability to switch between the curb and snaffle setting on a kimberwick. When I was competing with this bit, I'd often start with the reins clipped to the curb setting, then switch to the snaffle setting after she settled down and quit pulling.
My only grumble is that they only stock the kimberwick in 5" sizes. Myler bits tend to run just a touch on the large side anyway, so 5" is really too big for pony's pea-head. They do custom orders , but I use a bit so little now that it hardly seems worth it.
Exhibit B is my "cowgirl" set-up. Myler Western Dee Snaffle with Sweet Iron Bristol Roller (MB11). Also a Level One bit. It's basically a "dog-bone" double jointed with a little spinning copper roller around the middle of it. Mimi works well in it, mostly because I think she likes the copper and sweet iron. She tends to drool and slobber after a while because she's so busy working the spinning mouthpiece. Not a good bit on days when we're working on "quiet mouth." Rides "looser" than the comfort snaffle because the joints on the snaffle have a lot of play between them. Not as good in the "subtle communication" department. But it's a pretty bit that appeals to my inner cowgirl. (Me, shallow?!?)
And then I've got several "homeless" bits...ones that live in my drawer of extra tack, ones that are either similar to something I'm already using, or have been tried and discarded as absolutely unsuitable by the Pony Committee of One.
And of course, I have a couple other bitless rigs floating around as well. This one's a vosal...mechanical interpretation of the old-time rawhide bosals. I'm on the fence about this one. Definitely a lack of fine-tune control. No side-to-side lateral control whatsoever. I still keep it around, though.
I collect bits.
I probably can't even count how many bits I've used/owned over the years. Start between "a lot" and "a ton" and go from there. It started with my show days and went from there. I think I probably used seven or eight different Western bits over the years, starting with a snaffle and very quickly moving into all manner of ported/shanked leverage bits. The joys of a young pony with no brakes and a young rider with no upper body strength. Shortcuts R Us. But I didn't know any different at the time. I was still trying to figure out how to ride a young horse, let alone train one.
English was easier...very quickly moved into a kimberwick and stayed there for pretty much our entire show career.
And gymkhana quickly complicated things again. Snaffle while I was still teaching her the patterns, then over to a mechanical hackamore when we started picking up the speed. But of course it couldn't be that simple...maybe one style of mechanical hackamore works better than another? And then on a whim, the week before our last show, I snagged an S-Hack while at the feed store. I had done about a year of distance riding at that point, and had seen distance riders using them. I figured I might eventually be able to use it. The real whim came about at the show when I put it on Mimi (without any testing/pre-riding at all) and ran all of the games in it. (And had some of the best runs ever.)
But distance riding really fed my bit obsession.
Mimi's always been a bit fussy. She has a low palate and a tiny mouth, and spends half of her time evading the bit rather than working with it. My trainer and I spent a lot of time swapping out bits, trying to find one she would work in. Fortunately, I learned my bit collecting ways very well from my trainer, and she had an entire box of bits to raid.
Distance riding also expanded my horizons and really furthered my education. For the first time, I was really examining the why of things, instead of accepting that something was "traditional and always done this way." Bit function was one of those areas of education, and that exploration brought me to the Myler bits.
I love Myler bits.
Mimi tolerates them.
I've gradually gotten rid of all of my other bits in favor of just keeping the Myler ones. I really appreciate their form and function and how they're designed to work with the horse. I feel like I end up with more of a connection and softer feel of the horse's mouth.
(Not a spokesperson/representative/paid mouthpiece for Myler. I just really like the product.)
And irony of ironies?
I barely use any of the bits I have.
As mentioned, Mimi really doesn't like bits. She tolerates the Myler ones. But she prefers to go bitless. Remember that S-Hack I mentioned earlier? Yep. That's her preferred headgear of choice.
It sort of looks like a jumble of purple spaghetti, but that's Mimi's trail bridle. Zilco Deluxe Endurance Halter/Bridle with the Wind Rider Aluminum S-Hack and Hought Beta-Biothane Noseband.
I really like the flatter beta nosebands that are out there now...much easier on their faces than the stiff rope-style nosebands. I've seen the rope-style used on horses that pull, and they eventually develop a bump on their nose from rubbing/pressure. Several layers of Vetwrap is supposed to combat this...
My major caveat on the hack: I prefer to use it on a horse that's already well-schooled in giving to pressure and going along nicely in a bit. Mimi responds really well to it, and I think a lot of that is due in part to the fact she's just happy it's not a bit, and therefore will cheerfully obey without fuss.
It still took me a couple of years of doing NATRC to work up the nerve to try it on her at an actual ride. She did great when I did finally use it, but then right about that time I started getting involved in endurance, and the idea of the faster pace and more race-like environment had me scrambling back to my comfort zone of a bit for our first year of endurance. October 2007, I used the hack on her at a ride, and haven't gone back to a bit since, except for schooling.
My preferred set-ups for schooling at the moment. Myler Kimberwick with Comfort Snaffle mouthpiece (MB02). It's considered a "Level One" (mild, typically used for intro level) mouthpiece. I like that it acts very much like a double-jointed snaffle, but it has less "play" in it and it's less work for the horse to hold it in their mouth.
I pulled off the regular kimberwick curb chain and replaced it with a biothane curb chain, because 1) the constant jingling from curb chains annoys me and 2) I'm lazy and hate having to always fiddle with the on/off of a curb chain. I like the ability to switch between the curb and snaffle setting on a kimberwick. When I was competing with this bit, I'd often start with the reins clipped to the curb setting, then switch to the snaffle setting after she settled down and quit pulling.
My only grumble is that they only stock the kimberwick in 5" sizes. Myler bits tend to run just a touch on the large side anyway, so 5" is really too big for pony's pea-head. They do custom orders , but I use a bit so little now that it hardly seems worth it.Exhibit B is my "cowgirl" set-up. Myler Western Dee Snaffle with Sweet Iron Bristol Roller (MB11). Also a Level One bit. It's basically a "dog-bone" double jointed with a little spinning copper roller around the middle of it. Mimi works well in it, mostly because I think she likes the copper and sweet iron. She tends to drool and slobber after a while because she's so busy working the spinning mouthpiece. Not a good bit on days when we're working on "quiet mouth." Rides "looser" than the comfort snaffle because the joints on the snaffle have a lot of play between them. Not as good in the "subtle communication" department. But it's a pretty bit that appeals to my inner cowgirl. (Me, shallow?!?)
And then I've got several "homeless" bits...ones that live in my drawer of extra tack, ones that are either similar to something I'm already using, or have been tried and discarded as absolutely unsuitable by the Pony Committee of One.
And of course, I have a couple other bitless rigs floating around as well. This one's a vosal...mechanical interpretation of the old-time rawhide bosals. I'm on the fence about this one. Definitely a lack of fine-tune control. No side-to-side lateral control whatsoever. I still keep it around, though.Not pictured is a traditional sidepull. Well, the braided nylon variety of traditional. It lives down at the barn as my "backup" headgear, but I rarely use it other than for aimlessly wandering around the arena for a few minutes. Requires way too much force to get Mimi, in a strong-and-opinionated mood, to listen to it. But I keep it around because it'll probably be a good young horse training tool in teaching them to give to pressure. But Mimi needs a little more authority in the form of the curb chain and leverage of the S-Hack.
And I have, of course, the rejects. Those aren't pictured, since they got sent on their way a while back. Aside from some of the show bits, I've gotten rid of comparatively few bits and/or headgear that I've used for distance. The ones that stick in my mind are:
- Myler Combo Bit with triple barrel mullen mouthpiece. I didn't care for this bit at all. It was too fussy to mess with, harder to use with a halter-bridle on pea-headed ponies, and it just seemed like it was too much at one time. Mimi hated it and fussed a ton with it on. Down the road it went.
- Myler Kimberwick with Forward Tilt Ported Barrel (MB36). I liked the comfort snaffle mouthpiece better. This was one of their Level 2-3 bits, and it was a lot of bit. It was great for the arena, but I tend to have "controlling hands" when out on trail, and prefer to ride with a mouthpiece that is a bit lighter and doesn't give them so many signals at once. Plus, I don't think Mimi's tiny mouth accommodated the more forward set of this particular mouthpiece. Didn't see the sense in leaving it around, so...sometimes I wish I'd held onto it, jsut in case I need it again.
- Dr. Cook's Bitless Bridle. As far as bitless goes, not my favorite option. Used it on the latter half of a NATRC ride and spent that seven-or-so-mile loop feeling like I was getting the proverbial middle ringer from the pony as she gleefully barged through it. Nice. Also didn't like the fact that it was tough to get it to release the pressure once it was tight. It found a new home pretty quickly.
To a lesser degree, I passed some of the bit interest along to Dad. His horses have been less complicated. Lucky him. His Foxtrotter mare Kelly came to us with a good old Tom Thumb snaffle and a habit of head-tossing. Gee, wonder why? We quickly swapped her over to a Myler short shank comfort snaffle and the head tossing really settled down, then several years later, put her in the same Myler kimberwick as Mimi. She really loved that bit, and when she went to her new home, we sent the bit with her in an effort to keep her happy and encourage the new owners to keep using said bit.
Beamer was even simpler...Myler English Dee snaffle with French Link mouthpiece (after schooling him in my Loose Ring snaffle...but the English D doesn't have the same "pull through the mouth" potential as the smaller-ring cheekpieces, and therefore doesn't need a curb strap attached...one less thing to fiddle with) for several years, and then transitioned him into an S-Hack. Sent both of those along with him, since he works well in both, but prefers the S-Hack. (Anything that makes eating easier...and it's less work, not having to carry a bit.)
And I have no doubt I'll still keep collecting as I eventually expand the herd, since I'm big on each horse having their own bit. You might say I'm a bit obsessed. ;)
Tuesday, August 10, 2010
My "Other" Life
It's been clear to me during this past week that I've been on break from school that I'm one of those people that, when functioning at normal capacity, always has one thing too many to do. Court reporting school and working part-time for my parents and horses and non-horsey interests and things that normal humans require to function, such as regular food and sleep.
Right now, I'm going into week two of a three-week break. Based on the fact I've not yet managed to register for fall classes, you can see how thrilled I am to be starting yet another semester. I'm over this school thing already, and ready to be done and be a working court reporter. And once I'm working, that will merge two activities -- school and work -- into one. See, timesaver.
(Of course, this is me naively ignoring all of the aspects of Real Life that will come with having a Proper Job and Entering the Real World.)
I've actually been able to ride Mimi more in this past week than I have since the summer began. That in itself is a sad commentary on my state of riding affairs of late.
That said, I'm going out riding tomorrow with a couple friends. Yes, back on trail again! Naturally, it would be at this time that she chooses to rub the outside of her tail, right where the crupper sits. Tail was perfect all summer...and the week I need to start using the crupper again, she opportunistically rubs. Ponies.
Off to hunt down all the extra fleecy, fluffy covers that might work on the crupper and give further protection, in addition to the layers of desitin liberally gobbed on the area.
Right now, I'm going into week two of a three-week break. Based on the fact I've not yet managed to register for fall classes, you can see how thrilled I am to be starting yet another semester. I'm over this school thing already, and ready to be done and be a working court reporter. And once I'm working, that will merge two activities -- school and work -- into one. See, timesaver.
(Of course, this is me naively ignoring all of the aspects of Real Life that will come with having a Proper Job and Entering the Real World.)
I've actually been able to ride Mimi more in this past week than I have since the summer began. That in itself is a sad commentary on my state of riding affairs of late.
That said, I'm going out riding tomorrow with a couple friends. Yes, back on trail again! Naturally, it would be at this time that she chooses to rub the outside of her tail, right where the crupper sits. Tail was perfect all summer...and the week I need to start using the crupper again, she opportunistically rubs. Ponies.
Off to hunt down all the extra fleecy, fluffy covers that might work on the crupper and give further protection, in addition to the layers of desitin liberally gobbed on the area.
Thursday, August 5, 2010
The Quest for the Perfect Boot
Splint boot, that is.
It's too early in the morning to get into the hoof boot debate. (Besides, we already know my answer to that one.) Edit: I started this post at 7:00 this morning. It's been a rough morning for my computer.
Hello, my name is Ashley, and I have a slight obsession with splint boots.
I've been questing after the "perfect" (if there's such a thing) splint boot since I started in endurance. Mimi doesn't interfere in her normal, everyday movement, so I don't need something that is heavy-duty enough to withstand artillery fire-style abuse.
So why even use boots, then?
Well, I'm paranoid about having some kind of leg protection. It's a holdover from my show days and an instructor who was superstitious about running horses in the gymkhana games without some kind of protection. The time you don't use them is the time something will happen. I know, I know...I did NATRC for five years and didn't have any problems. But I was also going at a slower pace and fewer miles.
It's just my personal opinion, but I'm going for the extra insurance provided by a well-fitting boot. It only takes one misplaced hoof or an ill-timed rock kicking up to potentially end your ride for the day. If I have a chance at preventing that, I'm going to take it.
Granted, if I had a horse that rubbed easily, and boots were more of a hassle than they were a benefit, I might rethink my stance.
Another one of those contested issues with boots is whether they help or harm when it comes to collecting desert debris. There are a lot of sharp, prickly, pokey things out in the desert, and I have to say, I prefer those pieces of cactus getting stuck in the outer layer of the boot fabric versus in my horse's leg. Would they have picked up the cactus piece if they brushed against it without boots on? Maybe, maybe not. But it takes a pretty hard hit to get a cactus spine through even a quarter inch of neoprene. So even if it clings to the surface of the boot, chances are that it hasn't broken through the entire boot to poke into the horse.
There are a couple of rides around Arizona that I have been very glad for leg protection. Man Against Horse in Prescott is one such ride. Every year, without fail, I have came back from that ridfe with a new rip in either the splint boots or the hind ankle boots. Sometimes both. There is a lot of manzanita at that ride, and a lot of it is trimmed right at the edge of the trail. One errant step, and that manzanita is poking at their leg. And that stuff is like ramming into rebar lined with steel leaves. A couple of years ago, a stick of manzanita ripped the entire way through the neoprene of the hind ankle boots, down to the very inside fabric covering. I cringe at what that might have potentially done to her leg if it gouged her in the right area. The rock-pile scramble up the backside of Mingus Mountain in the 50 at that ride also warrants the use of boots all around.
The extra protection is also nice for those trail-exploration rides that inevitably result in at least some bushwacking and rock scrambling.
Also, this is farfetched...but we have rattlesnakes. If one happens to strike at us, maybe they'll glance off the boot instead of biting the horse's leg? I know...unlikely. The skin is so tight around their legs that a snake would probably have a hard time biting it. But humor me?
Another issue is the collection of sand and debris. I really haven't experienced this problem. I don't really have any particular resoning or explaination for why that is, but at the moment, I'm not going to question it.
My requirements: Easy to put on/take off; doesn't trap too much heat; doesn't accumulate too much dirt and sand; well-placed seams that don't rub; won't slide down the leg; doesn't need to be overtight to prevent slipping; does not wrap around to the back of the fetlock (short cannons means that too bulky of a boot will crowd up agaist her Renegades and bump the captivator strap); isn't too long (see previous explaination about shortcannons); and I prefer a single later velcro that does not double back on itself. Double-lock would be an acceptable secondary option. Oh, and preferably a material that won't drag half of the prickly desert back with us.
Let's examine my history of boots, shall we?
Toklat Splint
These were my first pair of splint boots -- ever. I got them from my trainer the Christmas after I got Mimi. They're almost 14 years old now, and showing thier age. They still wash up nicely, but they're definitely tattered. Overall, they're my favorite boots yet.
What I Like:
- Easy maintenance. Dunk, wipe, and they're clean.
- Lots of pretty colors available.
- Have not had rubbing or slipping problems.
- Easy to remove at checks.
- Durable.
- Don't attract a ton of stickers and brush
What I Don't Like:
- The Velcro that doubles back on itself. It's too easy to overtighten them if you're not paying attention. For that reason alone, I'd be paranoid about letting someone else who is not familiar with the exact tightness I prefer put them on.
- More time-consuming to put back on because of having to feed the Velcro back through the loop.
- The new style. Notice behind the old boots, the rolled up pair with tags still attached. Those are the new pair I got to replace these. I don't like them as well. They have to be tightened more than I like to keep them from slipping. I used them at Wickenburg in February, and I had to adjust them several times just during the first loop beforeI finally finally left them behind at camp during the lunch hold. I don't know if they need more break-in time, but I wasn't as impressed with this pair. (As a note, the old ones now reside in my crew box as a back-up pair.)
Griffin's Short Splint/Brush Boots
I haven't used these on a regular basis until recently. I would use them for competitions, and enough training rides to know they wouldn't rub, but Mimi does little to no interfering on her hind legs. Just recently, I've noticed some scuffed hair on the inside front of her fetlocks, and have started using them more regularly as a precaution. I don't know if her fused hocks have changed her movement enough to where she's brushing against herself at times, or if she's just scuffing her hair when she's getting up from either rolling of laying down.
What I Like:
- Good protection. These boots have taken the brunt of the abuse from rides, and have several chunks/gouges/rips in them.
- Flat leather covering. Not a fan of heavily padded boots, or ones that have really rigid wear patches on the inside "strike zone."
- Easy clean.
- Colors!
- Single wrap-around Velcro.
- Really easy to take off. Putting on just takes a moment to make sure placement is correct to minimize rubbing,
- Don't attract a ton of stickers and brush.
What I Don't Like:
- I've had off-and-on rubbing problems with these. Originally, they would rub on the top edge. That's gone away, but the inside seam where it fathers at the fetlock has been known to start rubbing on her fetlocks. Desitin has held it off from being a serious problem at rides, but that's just one more step to fuss with that I'd like to avoid if possible. It could be that it's time for new ones...I think these are close to six years old, so the seams might just be getting rough and worn.
(Edit: Going to try lining the seam area with a small piece of moleskin to cover the stitching.)
Equipedic OxyFlow Splint Boots
What I Liked:
- Single wrap-around Velcro. Really easy on/off.
- Low-profile strike zone.
- Tough Cordura covering really repels brush and stickers. Also difficult for cactus to pierce compared to softer neoprenes with thin fabric coverings.
- Really did seem to be more breathable and stay cooler.
What I Didn't Like:
- Very tall. Either interfered with her knees, or had a lot of material hanging below the fetlock.
- Detail seaming was very rough and sloppy.
- Stiff fabric that didn't conform to her leg very nicely. Potential for rubbing from stiff-seamed edges. They didn't ever rub, but I also never got to the point of using them for rides.
- Wish they came in one size smaller. That might take care of the extra height, and make them conform to her leg better.
(Note: I ended up selling these a couple years ago. That alone should tell me what I need to know, if I didn't even feel justified in keeping them around as "just incase" extras.)
Pro Equine Simple Splint Boots
Used these for the vast majority of my distance training. They're probably about six or seven years old.
What I Liked:
- Double-lock Velcro. Not as convenient as single wrap, but better than the wrap back on itself kind.
- Low profile strike zone.
- Pretty easy on/off. The double-lock Velcro made it harder to just whip them off on-the-go.
What I Didn't Like:
- Outer Velcro layer wore out fast, and would never lay totally flat. Would tend to get caught on loose brush and completely undo the top Velcro layer.
- Debris tended to stick inside of them and you had to really scrub to get them clean.
Woof Wear Club Brushing Boots
What I Liked:
- Single wrap-around Velcro.
- Very easy on/off.
What I Didn't Like:
- Stiff PVC strike zone. Strike plate was not contoured enough, and very flat. Gave the boots an odd shape.
- Weird overlap on the edges, which caused the start of a weird rub.
- Gaped weird at the top -- same problem as the Griffin's Short Boots. Neither boot had as much front leg contouring and relied too much on Velcro and overlapping material to achieve a good fit.
Professional's Choice Competitor Splint Boots
What I Like:
- Single wrap-sround Velcro.
- Super-easy on/off. Probably the easiest of the boots I own.
- Overlap is even, and I've not had rubbing problems from it.
- Wash-n-go.
- Stay in place very well, due to waffle-neoprene against the horse.
- Impossible to overtighten.
- Neoprene has a lot of give.
- Can trim excess edges without fabric unraveling.
- Lightweight.
- Nicely contoured around the leg -- probably the most flexible boot I've ever used.
What I Don't Like:
- Potentially hold a lot of heat due to neoprene.
- Outer covering is essentially fuzzy Velcro. The same thing that makes them easy to put on without having to perfectly line up Velcro strips also means it attracts every little stray leaf and prickly piece of brush.
- Waffle neoprene needs to be scrubbed when washing, otherwise dirt gets trapped in the waffle pattern and doesn't eadily come out with just a quick dunk in water. That said, they actually seem to accumulate the least amount of dirt on the inside. I think the lack of fabric keeps dirt from clinging as much.
- Strike zone has more padding than most of my boots. This can be both a good and bad thing. Not a problem for a horse that doesn't interfere, but a horse that is on the verge of interfering might catch it. On the other hand, if they do interfere, there's some good protection there. Yet, it does have more give than the shell-like strike plates on some of the boots.
Professional's Choice Easy-Fit Splint Boots
They started out life as mine, but Dad inherited them for his Foxtrotter mare, Kelly, who interfered a lot. Same boot as above, only with more coverage around the fetlock. See my easlier remarks about too much fetlock coverage for little-legs Pony. And with these...even more neoprene to trap heat. Plus, they're pretty large, bulky boots. Worked well for a 15.1hh mare with tree trunk legs, but I think they'd be overkill on Mimi. Kelly definitely put them to the test, though...they're really scuffed at the bottom, right where they curve around the fetlock. Despite all of that, the worst she did was rub the sude covering to a smoother finish. Didn't even rip the strike zone.
Toklat Splint Boot with Elastic
Again, Dad's boots, not mine. He has the kind that are lined with felt, because Beamer hates neoprene. It makes him sweaty, which then makes him itchy, so he has to stop and attempt to yank the boots off in his annoyance. Not fun to be trotting along and have him slam to a stop, duck his head, and start teething on his leg wraps. So he has the felt-lined ones, which are kind of a pain to clean, and tend to build up grime...but they're the only thing he's comfortable in. And he has just enough of a tendency to interfere when he's not paying attention, or being clumsy, that it's not worth not using them. The double-lock Velcro is better than the loop-back offering of mine, and they're probably the second-easiest to put on/take off, after the Pro's Choice Competitors. However, not a fan of the extensive coverage of them -- they're another one that has more fetlock coverage.
After examining what I've written, I've decided that of all the boots I currently own, the Pro's Choice Competitor meets my needs the best at the moment. It has the best balance of what I like versus what I dislike. I may have ti pick little bits of desert prickles out of them during the dry weed season, but at least it's not any money out of pocket at the immediate moment.
But the elusive quest continues on for future purchase considerations, which means...
Readers...it's your turn! Tell me what splint boots you prefer, and your experiences with using them!
And, some specific questions for everyone:
Does anyone use the HAF Splint Boots?
I'm curious about them...I like the idea of air flow. However, I'm not convinced on what looks like a fairly hard shell as a strike plate. I'd like to see them in person. Feedback, anyone?
I'm also curious about the Thinline Splint Boots.
But the $100 price tag is enough to make me shy away. They'd have to be perfect for me to pay that much.
Finally, has anyone tried the Griffin's Tall Brush Boots for front boots?
I tried the short ones on her fronts, but wasn't pleased. I couldn't get them to line up well without gaping at the top, or creating an uneven overlap. Mimi wasn't impressed when I rode her in them, and stopped several times to try to yank them off. Looking at the picture of the Tall boots, I see they wrap around the fetlock some, which is enough to make me wonder if it'll be a case of too much "stuff" around her fetlock area and if the leg boot and Renegade captivator will start interfering with each other.
It's too early in the morning to get into the hoof boot debate. (Besides, we already know my answer to that one.) Edit: I started this post at 7:00 this morning. It's been a rough morning for my computer.
Hello, my name is Ashley, and I have a slight obsession with splint boots.
I've been questing after the "perfect" (if there's such a thing) splint boot since I started in endurance. Mimi doesn't interfere in her normal, everyday movement, so I don't need something that is heavy-duty enough to withstand artillery fire-style abuse.
So why even use boots, then?
Well, I'm paranoid about having some kind of leg protection. It's a holdover from my show days and an instructor who was superstitious about running horses in the gymkhana games without some kind of protection. The time you don't use them is the time something will happen. I know, I know...I did NATRC for five years and didn't have any problems. But I was also going at a slower pace and fewer miles.
It's just my personal opinion, but I'm going for the extra insurance provided by a well-fitting boot. It only takes one misplaced hoof or an ill-timed rock kicking up to potentially end your ride for the day. If I have a chance at preventing that, I'm going to take it.
Granted, if I had a horse that rubbed easily, and boots were more of a hassle than they were a benefit, I might rethink my stance.
Another one of those contested issues with boots is whether they help or harm when it comes to collecting desert debris. There are a lot of sharp, prickly, pokey things out in the desert, and I have to say, I prefer those pieces of cactus getting stuck in the outer layer of the boot fabric versus in my horse's leg. Would they have picked up the cactus piece if they brushed against it without boots on? Maybe, maybe not. But it takes a pretty hard hit to get a cactus spine through even a quarter inch of neoprene. So even if it clings to the surface of the boot, chances are that it hasn't broken through the entire boot to poke into the horse.
There are a couple of rides around Arizona that I have been very glad for leg protection. Man Against Horse in Prescott is one such ride. Every year, without fail, I have came back from that ridfe with a new rip in either the splint boots or the hind ankle boots. Sometimes both. There is a lot of manzanita at that ride, and a lot of it is trimmed right at the edge of the trail. One errant step, and that manzanita is poking at their leg. And that stuff is like ramming into rebar lined with steel leaves. A couple of years ago, a stick of manzanita ripped the entire way through the neoprene of the hind ankle boots, down to the very inside fabric covering. I cringe at what that might have potentially done to her leg if it gouged her in the right area. The rock-pile scramble up the backside of Mingus Mountain in the 50 at that ride also warrants the use of boots all around.
The extra protection is also nice for those trail-exploration rides that inevitably result in at least some bushwacking and rock scrambling.
Also, this is farfetched...but we have rattlesnakes. If one happens to strike at us, maybe they'll glance off the boot instead of biting the horse's leg? I know...unlikely. The skin is so tight around their legs that a snake would probably have a hard time biting it. But humor me?
Another issue is the collection of sand and debris. I really haven't experienced this problem. I don't really have any particular resoning or explaination for why that is, but at the moment, I'm not going to question it.
My requirements: Easy to put on/take off; doesn't trap too much heat; doesn't accumulate too much dirt and sand; well-placed seams that don't rub; won't slide down the leg; doesn't need to be overtight to prevent slipping; does not wrap around to the back of the fetlock (short cannons means that too bulky of a boot will crowd up agaist her Renegades and bump the captivator strap); isn't too long (see previous explaination about shortcannons); and I prefer a single later velcro that does not double back on itself. Double-lock would be an acceptable secondary option. Oh, and preferably a material that won't drag half of the prickly desert back with us.
Let's examine my history of boots, shall we?
Toklat Splint
These were my first pair of splint boots -- ever. I got them from my trainer the Christmas after I got Mimi. They're almost 14 years old now, and showing thier age. They still wash up nicely, but they're definitely tattered. Overall, they're my favorite boots yet.
What I Like:
- Easy maintenance. Dunk, wipe, and they're clean.
- Lots of pretty colors available.
- Have not had rubbing or slipping problems.
- Easy to remove at checks.
- Durable.
- Don't attract a ton of stickers and brush
What I Don't Like:
- The Velcro that doubles back on itself. It's too easy to overtighten them if you're not paying attention. For that reason alone, I'd be paranoid about letting someone else who is not familiar with the exact tightness I prefer put them on.
- More time-consuming to put back on because of having to feed the Velcro back through the loop.
- The new style. Notice behind the old boots, the rolled up pair with tags still attached. Those are the new pair I got to replace these. I don't like them as well. They have to be tightened more than I like to keep them from slipping. I used them at Wickenburg in February, and I had to adjust them several times just during the first loop beforeI finally finally left them behind at camp during the lunch hold. I don't know if they need more break-in time, but I wasn't as impressed with this pair. (As a note, the old ones now reside in my crew box as a back-up pair.)
Griffin's Short Splint/Brush Boots
I haven't used these on a regular basis until recently. I would use them for competitions, and enough training rides to know they wouldn't rub, but Mimi does little to no interfering on her hind legs. Just recently, I've noticed some scuffed hair on the inside front of her fetlocks, and have started using them more regularly as a precaution. I don't know if her fused hocks have changed her movement enough to where she's brushing against herself at times, or if she's just scuffing her hair when she's getting up from either rolling of laying down.
What I Like:
- Good protection. These boots have taken the brunt of the abuse from rides, and have several chunks/gouges/rips in them.
- Flat leather covering. Not a fan of heavily padded boots, or ones that have really rigid wear patches on the inside "strike zone."
- Easy clean.
- Colors!
- Single wrap-around Velcro.
- Really easy to take off. Putting on just takes a moment to make sure placement is correct to minimize rubbing,
- Don't attract a ton of stickers and brush.
What I Don't Like:
- I've had off-and-on rubbing problems with these. Originally, they would rub on the top edge. That's gone away, but the inside seam where it fathers at the fetlock has been known to start rubbing on her fetlocks. Desitin has held it off from being a serious problem at rides, but that's just one more step to fuss with that I'd like to avoid if possible. It could be that it's time for new ones...I think these are close to six years old, so the seams might just be getting rough and worn.
(Edit: Going to try lining the seam area with a small piece of moleskin to cover the stitching.)
Equipedic OxyFlow Splint Boots
What I Liked:
- Single wrap-around Velcro. Really easy on/off.
- Low-profile strike zone.
- Tough Cordura covering really repels brush and stickers. Also difficult for cactus to pierce compared to softer neoprenes with thin fabric coverings.
- Really did seem to be more breathable and stay cooler.
What I Didn't Like:
- Very tall. Either interfered with her knees, or had a lot of material hanging below the fetlock.
- Detail seaming was very rough and sloppy.
- Stiff fabric that didn't conform to her leg very nicely. Potential for rubbing from stiff-seamed edges. They didn't ever rub, but I also never got to the point of using them for rides.
- Wish they came in one size smaller. That might take care of the extra height, and make them conform to her leg better.
(Note: I ended up selling these a couple years ago. That alone should tell me what I need to know, if I didn't even feel justified in keeping them around as "just incase" extras.)
Pro Equine Simple Splint Boots
Used these for the vast majority of my distance training. They're probably about six or seven years old.
What I Liked:
- Double-lock Velcro. Not as convenient as single wrap, but better than the wrap back on itself kind.
- Low profile strike zone.
- Pretty easy on/off. The double-lock Velcro made it harder to just whip them off on-the-go.
What I Didn't Like:
- Outer Velcro layer wore out fast, and would never lay totally flat. Would tend to get caught on loose brush and completely undo the top Velcro layer.
- Debris tended to stick inside of them and you had to really scrub to get them clean.
Woof Wear Club Brushing Boots
What I Liked:
- Single wrap-around Velcro.
- Very easy on/off.
What I Didn't Like:
- Stiff PVC strike zone. Strike plate was not contoured enough, and very flat. Gave the boots an odd shape.
- Weird overlap on the edges, which caused the start of a weird rub.
- Gaped weird at the top -- same problem as the Griffin's Short Boots. Neither boot had as much front leg contouring and relied too much on Velcro and overlapping material to achieve a good fit.
Professional's Choice Competitor Splint Boots
What I Like:
- Single wrap-sround Velcro.
- Super-easy on/off. Probably the easiest of the boots I own.
- Overlap is even, and I've not had rubbing problems from it.
- Wash-n-go.
- Stay in place very well, due to waffle-neoprene against the horse.
- Impossible to overtighten.
- Neoprene has a lot of give.
- Can trim excess edges without fabric unraveling.
- Lightweight.
- Nicely contoured around the leg -- probably the most flexible boot I've ever used.
What I Don't Like:
- Potentially hold a lot of heat due to neoprene.
- Outer covering is essentially fuzzy Velcro. The same thing that makes them easy to put on without having to perfectly line up Velcro strips also means it attracts every little stray leaf and prickly piece of brush.
- Waffle neoprene needs to be scrubbed when washing, otherwise dirt gets trapped in the waffle pattern and doesn't eadily come out with just a quick dunk in water. That said, they actually seem to accumulate the least amount of dirt on the inside. I think the lack of fabric keeps dirt from clinging as much.
- Strike zone has more padding than most of my boots. This can be both a good and bad thing. Not a problem for a horse that doesn't interfere, but a horse that is on the verge of interfering might catch it. On the other hand, if they do interfere, there's some good protection there. Yet, it does have more give than the shell-like strike plates on some of the boots.
Professional's Choice Easy-Fit Splint Boots
They started out life as mine, but Dad inherited them for his Foxtrotter mare, Kelly, who interfered a lot. Same boot as above, only with more coverage around the fetlock. See my easlier remarks about too much fetlock coverage for little-legs Pony. And with these...even more neoprene to trap heat. Plus, they're pretty large, bulky boots. Worked well for a 15.1hh mare with tree trunk legs, but I think they'd be overkill on Mimi. Kelly definitely put them to the test, though...they're really scuffed at the bottom, right where they curve around the fetlock. Despite all of that, the worst she did was rub the sude covering to a smoother finish. Didn't even rip the strike zone.
Toklat Splint Boot with Elastic
Again, Dad's boots, not mine. He has the kind that are lined with felt, because Beamer hates neoprene. It makes him sweaty, which then makes him itchy, so he has to stop and attempt to yank the boots off in his annoyance. Not fun to be trotting along and have him slam to a stop, duck his head, and start teething on his leg wraps. So he has the felt-lined ones, which are kind of a pain to clean, and tend to build up grime...but they're the only thing he's comfortable in. And he has just enough of a tendency to interfere when he's not paying attention, or being clumsy, that it's not worth not using them. The double-lock Velcro is better than the loop-back offering of mine, and they're probably the second-easiest to put on/take off, after the Pro's Choice Competitors. However, not a fan of the extensive coverage of them -- they're another one that has more fetlock coverage.
After examining what I've written, I've decided that of all the boots I currently own, the Pro's Choice Competitor meets my needs the best at the moment. It has the best balance of what I like versus what I dislike. I may have ti pick little bits of desert prickles out of them during the dry weed season, but at least it's not any money out of pocket at the immediate moment.
But the elusive quest continues on for future purchase considerations, which means...
Readers...it's your turn! Tell me what splint boots you prefer, and your experiences with using them!
And, some specific questions for everyone:
Does anyone use the HAF Splint Boots?
I'm curious about them...I like the idea of air flow. However, I'm not convinced on what looks like a fairly hard shell as a strike plate. I'd like to see them in person. Feedback, anyone?
I'm also curious about the Thinline Splint Boots.
But the $100 price tag is enough to make me shy away. They'd have to be perfect for me to pay that much.
Finally, has anyone tried the Griffin's Tall Brush Boots for front boots?
I tried the short ones on her fronts, but wasn't pleased. I couldn't get them to line up well without gaping at the top, or creating an uneven overlap. Mimi wasn't impressed when I rode her in them, and stopped several times to try to yank them off. Looking at the picture of the Tall boots, I see they wrap around the fetlock some, which is enough to make me wonder if it'll be a case of too much "stuff" around her fetlock area and if the leg boot and Renegade captivator will start interfering with each other.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)












